1 Canada is one of the world’s largest oil producers, yet some provinces still rely on imported oil. Recently, several provincial leaders are pushing to build a cross-country pipeline, arguing that it could help increase energy independence and diversify trade partners. Do you support building one?
2 Which of the following statements best reflects your view on Canada's energy market and its reliance on imports?
Totals may exceed 100% due to multiple answer choices
Canada should use its own oil
|
|
Imports make sense if they’re cheaper
|
|
We need pipelines to solve this
|
|
Energy independence isn’t realistic
|
|
A mix of domestic and imported is best
|
|
It’s more about politics than oil
|
|
Canada needs more diverse energy options
|
|
3 Currently, Canada exports 97% of its crude oil to the U.S. Some say this makes us vulnerable to tariffs, while others see the U.S. as a reliable partner. Do you agree that Canada should diversify its energy trade market?
Cancel or pause whenever you want For first-time subscribers only
4 Quebec Premier François Legault recently reaffirmed his opposition to a cross-country pipeline project, citing a lack of “social acceptability” in his province. Yet, a public survey shows over 60% of Quebecers support the project. What do you think are the main reasons for Quebec's opposition?
Totals may exceed 100% due to multiple answer choices
Quebecers oppose national projects crossing their borders
|
|
It’s about provincial autonomy
|
|
Environmental concerns matter most
|
|
It’s a negotiation tactic
|
|
Political strategy—appeasing local voters
|
|
5 In your view, how likely is Quebec to collaborate on a cross-country pipeline in the near future?
6 Gas prices go up and down, influenced by factors like fuel imports and transportation costs. Do you think more pipelines would lower gas prices?
Yes, more supply means lower prices
|
|
No, prices are controlled globally
|
|
7 Do you think the federal government should make the building of a cross-Canada pipeline a high priority?
8 How would you rate the Canadian media's coverage of the cross-Canada pipeline debate?
Excellent: fair, thorough, and well-balanced
|
|
Good: informative but lacks deeper analysis of underlying issues
|
|
Average: provides basic details, but misses critical context
|
|
Poor: sensationalized, biased, or overlooks important facts
|
|
|